Methodology and artifacts
See how we define the systems and permissions under review, document findings, and recommend fixes.
- Approach page
- Sample review package
- Enterprise buyer packet
Proof and trust
Explore our review methodology, sample reports, security practices, research, and engineering background before scoping an engagement.
Overview
What you receive
Use these materials to evaluate our approach, review sample deliverables, and identify any additional information your diligence process requires.
See how we define the systems and permissions under review, document findings, and recommend fixes.
Founder-led review by Kevin O'Connor, with security-engineering and advanced threat research experience.
Security contact details, a PGP key, vulnerability reporting instructions, and NDA and data-handling arrangements before detailed review. Keep sensitive materials out of public forms.
Open research and field notes cover AI-agent authority, MCP/tool risk, RAG boundaries, prompt injection, and production-readiness review.
01
We agree on the decision and systems to review, examine permissions and failure scenarios, and link findings to supporting records and recommended changes.
Kevin O'Connor's background in security engineering, advanced threat research and AI-security assessment.
Program participation and institutional support are distinct from certification of a client system. Ask about the scope of any affiliation relevant to your review.
02
Next step