AI-system behavior
Review of agent actions, model outputs, tool calls, retrieval paths, approval gates, logging, and whether technical claims match observed behavior.
Counsel support
Check AI-security claims against the technical record.
Discreet support for counsel, litigation teams, boards, and insurers when AI-system behavior, security controls, incident artifacts, or vendor claims require senior technical assessment.
What you receive
What the engagement covers.
- Independent technical assessment of materials, system state, controls, or claims
- Clear written findings with assumptions and limits separated from conclusions
- Counsel-facing question list and follow-up material requests
- Support for technical declarations, reports, or testimony where appropriate
- Executive or board-facing summary when the matter requires leadership briefing
01
Common matters
Security controls
Assessment of access controls, identity posture, logging, incident artifacts, remediation claims, and control descriptions.
Vendor or product claims
Independent review of assertions made in diligence, procurement, incident communications, marketing, or technical materials.
02
What the report establishes
- No promise of litigation outcome or business result.
- Conclusions apply only to the systems and materials reviewed.
- Clear distinction between confirmed materials, assumptions, open questions, and technical opinion.
Limits
Scope and limitations.
- Engagement acceptance depends on conflicts, scope, timing, and whether the available materials support a reliable technical review.
- Legal strategy remains counsel's responsibility.
Next step