AI-system behavior
Review of agent actions, model outputs, tool calls, retrieval paths, approval gates, logging, and whether technical claims match observed behavior.
Counsel support
Independent technical review when AI-security claims must hold up.
Discreet support for counsel, litigation teams, boards, and insurers when AI-system behavior, security controls, incident artifacts, or vendor claims require senior technical assessment.
What you receive
Concrete outputs for a specific decision.
- Independent technical assessment of materials, system state, controls, or claims
- Clear written findings with assumptions and limits separated from conclusions
- Counsel-facing question list and follow-up material requests
- Support for technical declarations, reports, or testimony where appropriate
- Executive or board-facing summary when the matter requires leadership briefing
01
Common matters
Security controls
Assessment of access controls, identity posture, logging, incident artifacts, remediation claims, and control descriptions.
Vendor or product claims
Independent review of assertions made in diligence, procurement, incident communications, marketing, or technical materials.
02
How the work is framed
- No promise of litigation outcome or business result.
- No inflated assurance claims beyond the reviewed scope.
- Clear distinction between confirmed materials, assumptions, open questions, and technical opinion.
Limits
Scope and assumptions stay explicit.
- Engagement acceptance depends on conflicts, scope, timing, and whether the available materials support a reliable technical review.
- Legal strategy remains counsel's responsibility.
Next step