AI Agent Security Assessment
Test one agent workflow: the data it can reach, the actions it can take, and the controls that should stop unauthorized behavior.
View assessment scopeBack to AI Security services
AI Security
Assess, build and harden your AI systems.
Check what your AI system can read, change and send. We test agents, MCP connections, retrieval systems and coding workflows, help teams fix known security issues, and build integrations with the controls needed to operate them.
Assessment options
Choose the system you need reviewed.
MCP Security Review
A technical review of Model Context Protocol servers, clients, tools, tokens, and approval paths before broad rollout.
View assessment scopeRAG Security Assessment
Review tenant isolation, document permissions and generated responses in retrieval-augmented systems.
View assessment scopeAI Coding Security Review
A focused review for teams using Cursor, Copilot, Claude Code, or other AI coding workflows with repository, CI/CD, secrets, or deployment access.
View assessment scopeEngineering work
Build a workflow or act on existing findings.
Implementation puts a defined workflow into use. Remediation addresses findings from an assessment. Both are quoted separately, with tests and handover included in the proposal.
Secure AI implementation
Build an AI workflow that can use approved data and tools, with access controls, evaluation and operating instructions included.
Scoped after an initial discussion
Read the scopeAI security remediation
Fix known AI security issues in code, permissions, retrieval or operations, then test the changes and document anything still open.
Scoped after an initial discussion
Read the scopeChecks on our own implementation or remediation are verification or retesting. We disclose the relationship; an independent assessment requires a reviewer separate from that work.
Explore Device & Firmware AssessmentsExternal AI review
Independent review of AI controls.
Check AI access controls, monitoring and detection with an outside reviewer. Receive technical findings and a board report; the review can address the White House Accord’s voluntary commitments.
Need a broader security or architecture review?
A technical risk review examines architecture, dependencies and vendor claims across the wider system. It can support a purchase, investment or launch that extends beyond one AI workflow.
Explore CybersecurityOngoing advisory
Review changes as the system evolves.
Bring recurring architecture questions, release changes and customer security reviews to an adviser who can follow the system over time.
Board advisory and executive briefings
Technical context for board oversight, risk appetite, and launch decisions.
Independent advice for boards and executive teams on cybersecurity controls, system access, product risk, vendor claims and changes that affect launch plans. AI-system permissions are included where relevant. Available as a briefing or recurring support.
Discuss board advisoryFractional security and systems advisory
Regular technical review for architecture, product changes and customer security questions.
Regular access to a Principal Engineer for architecture, cybersecurity controls, product-security questions, AI-system changes, customer reviews and roadmap tradeoffs.
Discuss fractional advisory