Can you remediate another firm’s findings?
Yes, subject to scope, access and the available technical information. We confirm the affected version, understand how the issue was established and agree how the change will be checked.
AI security remediation
Address defined AI security gaps with engineering changes, focused verification and a clear record of what remains unresolved.
Scope
We review the available findings and system context, confirm the target changes and agree acceptance criteria. If a finding is unclear, reproducing or clarifying it may be the first scoped task.
Work may include application fixes, permission changes, retrieval isolation, secret handling, evaluation coverage, logging or operating procedures. The scope identifies the affected versions and environments, the access needed and who can authorize each change.
Deliverables
Agreed changes to code, configuration or operating procedures.
Verification results tied to the scoped issues and acceptance criteria.
A record of unresolved items, assumptions and residual risks.
Handover notes and a discussion of any further work needed.
Before we begin
Start with the findings or technical concern, the affected workflow, code or configuration context, access constraints and target decision or deadline.
Findings from another reviewer are welcome. We may need to clarify their methods or reproduce an issue before agreeing the fix. Send a redacted summary first; detailed reports, code and access use an agreed channel.
Remediation is separately scoped from assessment. Fees, changes, acceptance criteria and handover are agreed before kickoff. Recurring support and operational coverage require a separate agreement.
Boundaries
We check our changes against the agreed criteria and report the results. These checks cover the scoped issues and relevant nearby behavior; they do not prove the absence of every vulnerability.
Because we made the changes, this work is verification or retesting. We disclose that relationship and do not describe it as an independent assessment of our own implementation.
Some issues depend on a vendor, architecture change, unavailable access or a wider business decision. Those dependencies and unresolved risks remain in the handover record.
Questions
Yes, subject to scope, access and the available technical information. We confirm the affected version, understand how the issue was established and agree how the change will be checked.
No. A finding may depend on systems or decisions outside the agreed work. We identify those dependencies, document unresolved items and agree any additional work before proceeding.
This service covers planned, scoped remediation. Discuss fit and availability before relying on it during an active event. It does not include 24/7 operational coverage.
Next step
A redacted summary of the finding, affected workflow and timing is enough for the initial discussion.